A response to the article 'Time to Move On', published in the TLS in September 2018.
Dear Dr. Quinn,
Eleanor Robson referenced your TLS article of 18 September on her Twitter
feed. I couldn't agree more with your argument, though I might quibble (minorly)
with some of the details. The term 'classics' is long past its sell-by
date.
I studied classics myself, but because I was studying in London in the
early 90s it was possible for me to study the languages, history and culture of
ancient Mesopotamia at the same time. As a result I saw a different picture of
the relationship between ancient Greece and Mesopotamian civilization than the
one I was being taught. I've been studying that relationship ever
since.
I self-published a book about that relationship in 2015 ('The Sacred
History of Being'). Some classicists have read it, but most are disinclined,
possibly because the argument seems to them to be too fantastic to be given
serious consideration. Even the very idea of such an argument seems often to be
beyond the pale.
It upends a number of constructs in our understanding of cultural
development in antiquity, both east and west, which is a hard thing to swallow.
But the evidence is there. The core argument of the book is that the same key
ideas appear in the context of religion in Greece, Assyria, Babylonia, and also
in Israel.
It is possible that Pythagoras brought these ideas back to Greece, after
military service with the Persians (there is an account of this in existence).
Which suggests that both abstract ideas and philosophical thought were not first
developed by the Greeks. For most classicists of course, it is axiomatic that
philosophical thought first began in Greece. The fact that Plato contradicted
this, and said that philosophy was of a very great age, seems to cut no ice at
all. Scholars (to generalise) are stuck in an episteme, which simply will not
allow the idea into conversation, even if it is there in the text.
I've argued for a long time that the Greek Enlightenment of the 5th century
B.C.E., is to a large extent a product of the European Enlightenment. And as you
say, that is where 'classics' saw the light of day in the form we recognise. But
the construct of classical civilization, as something aloof from other cultures
around the Mediterranean, has been seen through a number of times during the
past seventy years. Richard Broxton Onians saw through it, and knew the
connections with Mesopotamia were there, and possessed a good understanding of
their significance. I first read his book about thirty years ago, and I still
think of it as one of the great unexploded bombs in scholarship.
Thanks very much for writing the article, and for your clarity of
thought.
Best regards,
Thomas Yaeger
The original article, published in the TLS on September 18, 2018. A set of reviewer notes for The Sacred History of Being (with chapter listings) is available.
No comments:
Post a Comment