This is my second collection of essays on philosophy and ancient history. Like my first collection, Understanding Ancient Thought, it expands further on the arguments of The Sacred History of Being, which appeared in November 2015. Most of the 21 chapters have appeared in draft form on my web site, and one first appeared on the web site of the Bibliographica Philosophica Hermetica, run by the Ritman Library in Amsterdam (‘The Esoteric Conception of Divinity in the Ancient World’). Man and the Divine replaces The Frankish Tower, which was slated to be my next book Man and the Divine was published on August 12, 2018.
Many of the essays deal with the question of esoteric
knowledge in antiquity, often from slightly different angles. ‘The Death of
Socrates’ is one of those, a solicited response to one of a series of
dramatized readings of famous speeches from history, staged by the Almeida
Theatre in London in 2017. This reading was performed by Sir Derek Jacobi. ‘Distinguishing
Belief and Faith’ began as a meditation on some text by Alan Watts, but which
expanded into a chapter about who believed what, and why, in ancient Mesopotamia. ‘Polytheism,
Monotheism, and the Cult of the Aten’, explores Akhenaten’s religious
innovations in the Egypt of the 14th century B.C.E. These are still
difficult to understand, but we are getting closer.
Modern scholarship generally steers away from the idea that
there may be an esoteric level to the nature of reality, but approaches questions
surrounding esotericism in terms of a division between those who argue that
there is such an esoteric level of reality, and those who maintain that just
because they can think of such a thing and give it names and descriptions, does
not mean that there is genuine esoteric knowledge. The first group are
sometimes described as ‘Essentialists’, and the second, as ‘Nominalists’. I
dealt with this way of thinking in my book J.G.
Frazer and the Platonic Theory of Being. Frazer simply denied the
idea that it was possible to say anything meaningful at all about a
transcendent reality (Being), and consequently argued that Plato’s work was
built on a fundamental error, through the conversion of an epistemology into an
ontology.
Some of the essays discuss something of the background to the
writing of The Sacred History of Being.
It was important to produce a concise and focussed argument, and many interesting
discussions had to be put to one side in order to achieve that. The Sacred History of Being represents
the core argument. What I have written elsewhere is best understood in terms of
a sequence of extended footnotes to that book.
The final essay, ’Stone Circles, Phenomenology, and the Neolithic
Mind’, is necessarily more speculative than the others, and deals with the
British Neolithic and Early Bronze Age, when the building of megalithic
structures was at its height. It makes comparisons with Greek and Mesopotamian
notions of the importance of the sky in ancient religious thought.
Approximately 57,000 words. Available in ePub format. ISBN 9780463665473.
Approximately 57,000 words. Available in ePub format. ISBN 9780463665473.
Each of the 21 chapters is summarised below:
The Enlightenment of David Hume. Though
Hume's empirical approach was not wholly successful, some of his intuitions
expanded our collective understanding of how we perceive reality – for example,
his insight that we have no actual knowledge of the process of causation at
all, and only a customary expectation of causal process, was a powerful one. We
can describe causal processes, we can differentiate the nature of different
causal processes, and we can formulate rules in connection with them, but we
cannot know how causality itself operates, or even be sure that a perceived
causal relation, often observed before, will obey the implicit rule the next
time it is under scrutiny by us. However, it is no longer clear that Hume was
exploring his mental processes and understanding entirely within the framework
of western secular thought. This chapter is based on intriguing research by
Alison Gopnik.
The Death of Socrates. It is a puzzle that, in the
midst of a thoroughly polytheistic culture in Athens, with its plethora of
gods, its many cults and priesthoods in the service of those gods, that both
Socrates and Plato could speak of ‘god’ in the singular. Our difficulty here is
the result of a modern understanding of the significance of polytheism, which
sees the phenomenon as the inevitable precursor to monotheistic belief, which
excludes other gods from consideration, or credibility. For modern scholars,
polytheistic belief in ancient Greece was something which developed,
higgeldy-piggeldy, out of a plethora of local and tribal deities, much
embellished with myths about their lives and actions, which served important
social functions, but which had no universal meaning, and were not rooted in a
model of reality which embraced consideration of what the nature of reality
itself might be.
The Irrationality of Atheism, Atheists do not deny the existence of the world, its laws
and properties: they just argue that the concept of God is not required to
accept the world, and to have an understanding of it. But this leaves them at a
loss to explain how the world came to be, and why it should have come into
existence.
Richard Dawkins and Deism. Modern atheism is
actually dependent for its nature on the ontological argument, and the terms in
which it is framed. Meaning that eight hundred years of argument about the
nature and existence of God underpins the point of view of those who regard
themselves as atheists. Dawkins makes a distinction in ‘The God Delusion’
between theism and deism. Theism is a pattern of belief which enshrines the
idea that the Divine is responsive to man, and his rituals of worship and
prayer. It is a pattern of belief dependent on the idea that God can act in the
world. By contrast, deism contemplates the idea that a creator God has
existence, and necessarily created the world, but that he is not active in the
physical world beyond that. This essay argues that Dawkins is in fact a modern
deist rather than an atheist.
Contra Plantinga. Alvin Plantinga was kind
enough to accept a copy of The Sacred
History of Being. I sent two supplementary emails which outlined the
implications of its criticism of the traditional ontological argument, whose
function is to support a rational basis for belief, which are reproduced here.
Distinguishing Belief and Faith. Modern
scholarship has a track record of making easy assumptions about the continuity
of religious ideas and patterns of practice, and the accompanying social
compacts. At the time the Assyrian palaces, temples and cities were being dug
from the sand and soil in northern Mesopotamia, it was assumed that the
relationship between the royal and temple establishments could be understood in
terms of a modern division between church and state. This notion turned out to
hold very little water on close analysis. It is also the case that belief is
not a conspicuous feature of ancient religions.
Logic, Sophistry, and the Esoteric in Ancient Education.
Both Plato and Aristotle's writings contain arguments which either don't make
clear logical sense within themselves, or in the context of the rest of the work.
Sometimes the clues to the meaning of arguments are present elsewhere in the
canons of both Plato and Aristotle, and some of them clearly involve an
esoteric level of understanding. The whole body of their outputs need to be
taken on board in order to grasp the meaning of individual works. This is
usually not done with the works of Aristotle: his Historia Animalium is
read by biologists and specialists in animal taxonomies, but usually they read
little else of his work.
Beyond Mathematics and Geometry. The
process of separating ourselves from an interpretation of the world in terms of
simple apprehension is driven initially by the practical necessities of our
existence. But this process does not need to stop there. Intelligence consists
in being able to adjust the categories of our understanding so that we do not
mistake one thing for another. It is a mental development which might have no
end. This is essentially how Kant understood human intellectual development,
which he framed (in his Prolegomena) in terms of a general theory
of a priori concepts, not based on empirical sense data, or
even a mathematical or geometric understanding of anything in the world.
Evading the Infinite: A Review of A.W. Moore’s ‘History of
the Infinite’. This chapter is a critical response to Adrian W.
Moore's radio series 'The History of the Infinite', broadcast in the autumn of
2016, and his book 'The Infinite', published in the early 90s. His treatment of
the subject hardly references Plato at all. Adding Plato to the discussion
changes the way in which the argument should be framed. The actual infinite is the principal source of ancient ideas concerning the
divine, not Aristotle's potential infinite, so Moore's argument concerning our
knowledge of God is forced to take refuge in the quasi-mystical Calvinistic
idea of a 'sensus divinitatis'. His argument also makes it impossible to
understand Kant's treatment of religion.
The Esoteric Conception of Divinity in the Ancient World. In
my twenties, I was struck by the strong interest the ancients had
in the idea of limit – in art, architecture, philosophy, and ritual. This
interest did not much seem to engage modern scholarly attention, with a couple
of notable exceptions. Initially I had no idea at all what the significance of
the idea of limit might be, and no idea where pursuing it would take me. Or
that it would lead to a book it would take me four years to write, and which
would reframe my understanding of human intellectual history in the process.
Unwritten Doctrine, Ancient Silence. It is often
assumed by students of antiquity that there is no special importance to be
attached to remarks that certain items of information are to be kept secret and
not imparted to the unworthy, and to the ordinary mortal. This assumption is
based on the presumption that there was, and is not, anything about which it is
impossible to speak of, before those not used to dealing with information about
religion and the divine. This is a curiosity of modern times, in that the
ignorance of theology among the moderns makes it impossible for them to credit
the importance of theology in antiquity - both to those who understood
its subtleties and and those who didn’t.
Ancient Conjectures, and Fictive Intellectual History. Plato
argues that we should always look to the ‘one true thing’. J.G. Frazer also
argued that questions concerning Being (‘the one true thing’) were entirely
barren, since nothing could be predicated of Being. This of course is a spectacular
instance of intellectual blindness, by which the richness of the intellectual
matrix of ancient Greek thought was spirited into nothingness. In antiquity,
nods were made toward the notion that the discipline of philosophy might not
have been first developed in Greece, including (tellingly) at the beginning of
Diogenes Laertius' Lives of the Philosophers. Plato after all
argued against the idea that philosophy was invented by the Greeks in the Protagoras,
saying that it was of a great age – perhaps contemporary with the arrival of
peoples from Egypt, who settled in the Peloponnese, and also in Crete.
What is Sacred, and what is Profane? Each
of the divine names of Marduk, the head of the Mesopotamian pantheon, has
a description, and each of the lesser gods can be understood as abstractions of
aspects of the rational creation. They represent excellences in the world.
Marduk represents the sum total of these. This is the clue to
understanding much of the ancient understanding of what the divine is. Each
described excellence resembles reality itself in terms of its properties. The
excellence may serve social functions, as does a skill or specialism, but it
should be performed for its own sake. The performance of these excellences
recalls the perfection and completeness of the plenum, and reinforces the
presence of the divine in the world.
Intentionality, Conjecture, and What is Holy. Intentionality
explains why the ancients created a multiplicity of gods. If the divine itself
cannot by definition be completely defined and understood, at least certain
properties and attributes can be understood. These can therefore be defined and
named as ways of accessing the divine. This does not at all conflict with the
idea that the reality of the divine is in question. Instead this view argues
that there is in fact a subjective component in the reality of the divine, at
least insofar as it is possible for us to have commerce with it.
Excellence and the Knowledge of Divine Things. Plutarch
opens his life of Alexander with a cheerful complaint about the sheer extent of
the materials available to him to write on Alexander. So the details which are
in his essay are there because he regarded them as important in showing
Alexander’s character, his disposition, and the content of his mind. On the
basis of his sources he says that it is thought that Alexander was taught by Aristotle
not only his doctrines of Morals and Politics, but also those more abstruse
mysteries which are only communicated orally and are kept concealed from the
vulgar: for after he had invaded Asia, hearing that Aristotle had published
some treatises on these subjects, he wrote him a letter in which he defended
the practice of keeping these speculations secret.
Egypt in the Shadows. Since the European enlightenment,
the influence of Egypt on the development of abstract and philosophical thought
has been deprecated. Yet, as Martin Bernal showed in the third volume of Black Athena, many Greek words have plausible
etymologies from Egyptian. It is also the case that several of the concepts
used by Aristotle in his philosophical writing were known to Egyptians nine
hundred years before his time, such as the idea of completion (it is connected
with the idea of birth in Akhenaten’s Hymn to the Aten, which dates to the
fourteenth century BCE). There is also abundant evidence for the existence
of philosophical thought among the Hebrews in the books of the Old
Testament. Yahweh is described as ‘the first and last, and beside me
there is no God’. His name (minus the vowels) is a variant of the verb ‘to be’,
which suggests that his isolation is due to the fact that he was understood to
be Being itself.
Polytheism, Monotheism, and the Cult of the Aten. The
Aten is first mentioned (to our knowledge) in the Story of Sinuhe, which
dates at least as far back as the twelfth dynasty, where the dead king is
described as uniting with with the sun-disk in the heavens. Akhenaten’s
iconography never shows the god in anthropomorphic form – instead the Aten is
always shown as the sun disk with rays of light extending from it, with hands
at the end of each ray. The Sun god was considered to be neither male nor
female, but both simultaneously, an idea which was reflected in the depiction
of Akhenaten in sculpture and reliefs. His full title however was ‘The Ra-Horus
who rejoices in the horizon, in his/her Name of the Light which is seen in the
sun disk’. We find this full rendering of the Aten’s name on the stelae placed
around Akhetaten, which was Akhenaten’s newly founded capital. Sometimes the
full name was shortened to Ra-Horus-Aten, or just ‘Aten’. Since two of the
names of Akhenaten’s god refer to the sun (Ra being an older name for the sun
god), it seems that some kind of intellectual synthesis of older ideas had
taken place.
Cultural Continuity in the Ancient World, and Bernal’s
Black Athena. Martin Bernal’s intention was to take ancient Greece out of its
exalted orbit above all other civilizations, and root it in what he assumed to
have been a cultural continuum around the Mediterranean sea from at least the
mid-2nd millennium B.C.E up until the classical period of Greece in the 5th and
4th centuries B.C.E. Bernal pointed to the evidence within the texts of the 1st
millennium which suggested cultural continuities with ancient Egypt – all
dismissed by the classicists in favour of evidence in texts which could be
interpreted as suggesting the opposite. Bernal’s attempts to establish cultural
continuity with the civilizations around the Mediterranean were hampered by the
fact that myths are not simply encodings of historical and political change,
and that the exchange of words between linguistic groups is, by itself, weak
evidence for cultural continuity. He was
correct to guess at the existence of the cultural continuity, I think, but
ill-equipped to establish such a thing. To do this requires moving things
around – particularly re-anchoring the relationship of Greek philosophy to
patterns of religious belief and cult practice; and the establishing of the relationship
between Greek patterns of religious belief and cult practice to parallel ideas and behaviour
in the Near East and in Egypt.
The Age of the Lord Buddha. Scholars acquiesce in the
convention that an articulate and technical understanding of the
idea of Being was first broached by the Greeks in the middle of the 1st
Millennium BCE. It follows therefore that all references to the divine in
the ancient near east before that date are not articulate and
technical references, but notional and inchoate. The consequence must be
that we can learn nothing useful about ancient intellectual processes and
concerns from these notions, since they are beliefs entirely unsupported
by rational argument. This would come as a surprise to many ancient cultures,
if they were still around. The date of the Buddha's floruit for
western scholars is much closer to our own time than it is for scholars in
the east. We place him around the 5th century BCE, since there is clearly
an interest in universals in the texts. The Puranas provide a
chronology of the Magadha rulers from the supposed time of the Mahabharata
war, and Buddha is supposed to have become enlightened during the reign
of Bimbisara, the 5th Shishunaga ruler, who, according to this chronology,
ruled between 1852-1814 BCE. His birth date may have been 1887 BCE.
Chinese scholarship has long maintained that Buddhism came to China
from India around 1200-1100BCE.
Stone Circles, Phenomenology, and the Neolithic Mind. The
evidence from the megaliths makes the importance of the sky very clear: in
Britain and around the megalithic world, the sky was seen as a representation
of divinity, of Being. As an image of the divine, it was an image of totality
itself. The megalithic observatory, or temple, according to this hypothesis,
was a device to embody aspects of divinity, of Being, actually in its
structure, in the same way in which the gods in Mesopotamia might be invited to
occupy their representations on earth.
Available from my distributor Smashwords, and various retailers, including Itunes, Barnes and Noble, Blio, Inktera, etc, and a number of library distributors.
Page updated July 13 &16, and December 16, 2018.
Available from my distributor Smashwords, and various retailers, including Itunes, Barnes and Noble, Blio, Inktera, etc, and a number of library distributors.
Page updated July 13 &16, and December 16, 2018.
Hi Thomas, My name is Luis :)
ReplyDeleteI quote you: "Atheists do not deny the existence of the world, its laws and properties: they just argue that the concept of God is not required to accept the world, and to have an understanding of it. But this leaves them at a loss to explain how the world came to be, and why it should have come into existence."
Not so, if an atheist hypothesizes the world always was, i.e. never 'came into existence', just as a theist hypothesizes that God was 'always there'.
Luis, hi. The question which cannot be answered is '*why* does the physical world exist?'. As I said, the atheist simply has to accept it. Best, TY
ReplyDelete