This is a short book about a very large subject – the transcendentalism which is present in ancient religions, located to the west of India.
Normally it is assumed that there is very little in the way of transcendentalist thought associated with these ancient religions, and that the evidence we are looking at is mainly built out of concrete imagery, fanciful myth, poetry, irrational associations, all of which are in the service of religion and the state. In other words, religion serves a series of social and ideological functions, and it is to those functions that we should look for the explanation of the cultural remains, rather than the minds of the ancients themselves.
Is this actually so? Or are we the victims of an enlightenment agenda which sought to remake the history of religion and religious thought in terms of a mockery of reason?
That is one of the arguments of this book – that we have been sold short by enlightenment presumptions and certainties, and that what we think we know and understand about ancient religion is so far from its real basis that, for the most part, it is nearly impossible for modern scholars to make intelligible sense of it.
This book is short, not because the questions it addresses are simple, and have easy answers. It is short because I have written four other books before this one, and, to a significant extent, it references argument and discussion which can be found in those books. It was not possible to write a short and credible introduction to an understanding of the transcendentalism which can be found in ancient religions, without first covering an enormous amount of ground.
Scholars must decide for themselves if the argument of this book is soundly based. The problem for scholars is that they live and work within what Michel Foucault called an ‘episteme’. This is a model of reality dependent on many presumptions. Not only does the episteme shape discussion, it controls what can actually be discussed, or even be seen by those within it. Most scholars would have difficulty in recognising the epistemic limitations of their disciplines if the suggestion was put to them that such limitations exist. But if you can accept the broad thrust of the case this book is making, you are already halfway out of the scholarly episteme.
Preface
On Ancient Religion
Parallels and Discontinuity between Contemporary and Ancient Religions
The definition of Transcendentalism in Religion
Preface
On Ancient Religion
Parallels and Discontinuity between Contemporary and Ancient Religions
The definition of Transcendentalism in Religion
The Origin of the Transcendentalist Perspective
The Nature of Reality
Contradiction and Paradox
Transcendence and Immanence
Detecting the Presence of Transcendentalist Thought
The Future of our Understanding of the Past
Notes
Thomas Yaeger, March 25, 2018.
No comments:
Post a Comment